Ambiguity and Interpretation (If I wrote the dictionary)

Please dissent or affirm any position expressed in the form of a commment: (my own personal definitions)
Love. Agape, Eros, Phileo, Storge

1. Love: A four letter word describing 4 philosophical and complex types of human affection and bonding. Often when used, it's modifying classifiers are ommited on the assumtions that the subject 'Understands' which of the four is referenced. Not neccisarily a scary thing, but can be misconstrued as such if modifier is not exacted. Useful only if user specifies to audience or object which of the four classifications it is in refernece to.

2. Intimacy: a human necessity as well as a deep expression of the soul to another in the form of love, sex and/or friendship resulting in bonding.

3. Sex: An act between one or more entities that may or may not convey love and/or intimacy.
*I was told today that sex and intimacy are different. I got mad… but not till later. Sometimes they are, but not ALWAYS... I wish I could have had an eloquent esquire rehearsed response when I heard it, but I didn’t. I get angry because although not the same, the two rapidly mix. Granted the act of sex might be different or oppositional to intimacy in extreme cases. But for the most part one accentuates the other.

Consider the addition of the following:

4. Passion: A modifiaction of human soul with tenfold intensity of a poetic adjective. The element of volatility often equated with actions of love and positivity. Often forgotten is its effect as a pendulum emotion that has a low. A low as dark as the high is life-changingly uplifting. Considered positive yet, without a multiple outlet in equilibruim; (if consentrated in any one element such as the quest for power without the addition of love, passion can be devastating

Are all of these elements indpendant and merely modifications of on another? Or are they simple pieces of a collective puzzle. You tell me....